<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of Today&#8217;s Media in a Digital World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techprnibbles.com/2011/11/state-of-todays-media-in-a-digital-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techprnibbles.com/2011/11/state-of-todays-media-in-a-digital-world/</link>
	<description>* A nibble is half a computing byte. A Tech PR Nibble is an insight or idea that can lead to conversation, a big idea or influence for a brand. The shared thinking of the global Ogilvy PR technology practice community; dedicated to Technology and Beyond. Participants in our social media world.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.techprnibbles.com/2011/11/state-of-todays-media-in-a-digital-world/comment-page-1/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprnibbles.com/2011/11/state-of-todays-media-in-a-digital-world/#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>I find Angie Goff's quote chilling. Most mainstream media operated under the assumption that the public *needed* exposure to information they might not otherwise seek out, but which was considered important to know.  Making content a popularity contest may bring in the eyeballs and clickthroughs, but hardly serves the goal of creating a well informed public (with negative impacts for our democracy).  Perhaps this is merely the digital era version of "if it bleeds, it leads". But it sounds worse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Angie Goff&#8217;s quote chilling. Most mainstream media operated under the assumption that the public *needed* exposure to information they might not otherwise seek out, but which was considered important to know.  Making content a popularity contest may bring in the eyeballs and clickthroughs, but hardly serves the goal of creating a well informed public (with negative impacts for our democracy).  Perhaps this is merely the digital era version of &#8220;if it bleeds, it leads&#8221;. But it sounds worse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
