<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Mark Cuban is Sort of Right and Sort of Wrong About the Murdoch / Google News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techprnibbles.com/2009/11/why-mark-cuban-is-sort-of-right-and-sort-of-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techprnibbles.com/2009/11/why-mark-cuban-is-sort-of-right-and-sort-of-wrong/</link>
	<description>* A nibble is half a computing byte. A Tech PR Nibble is an insight or idea that can lead to conversation, a big idea or influence for a brand. The shared thinking of the global Ogilvy PR technology practice community; dedicated to Technology and Beyond. Participants in our social media world.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nichole</title>
		<link>http://www.techprnibbles.com/2009/11/why-mark-cuban-is-sort-of-right-and-sort-of-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprnibbles.com/?p=620#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>Just read your previous post, and it seems we're on the same page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read your previous post, and it seems we&#8217;re on the same page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nichole</title>
		<link>http://www.techprnibbles.com/2009/11/why-mark-cuban-is-sort-of-right-and-sort-of-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprnibbles.com/?p=620#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>Not having read your previous post, or Mark Cuban's, I don't know if the issue of search was discussed. To my knowledge, and in my personal practice, Twitter and Google have separate uses. Twitter is for snippets of information that I don't seek out. Whereas Google is my go-to for specific information. I rarely ever search Twitter, and when I do its to follow "hashtagged" conversations.

Perhaps I'm not a forward thinking as Murdoch, but this seems a bit knee-jerk and short-sighted to me. If your product (newspapers) isn't available where a still large numbers of consumers (readers) shop, then you lose. Not Google. And depending on the publication delisted, not the readers either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not having read your previous post, or Mark Cuban&#8217;s, I don&#8217;t know if the issue of search was discussed. To my knowledge, and in my personal practice, Twitter and Google have separate uses. Twitter is for snippets of information that I don&#8217;t seek out. Whereas Google is my go-to for specific information. I rarely ever search Twitter, and when I do its to follow &#8220;hashtagged&#8221; conversations.</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m not a forward thinking as Murdoch, but this seems a bit knee-jerk and short-sighted to me. If your product (newspapers) isn&#8217;t available where a still large numbers of consumers (readers) shop, then you lose. Not Google. And depending on the publication delisted, not the readers either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
