<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Decade of Tech Flops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techprnibbles.com/2009/07/a-decade-of-tech-flops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techprnibbles.com/2009/07/a-decade-of-tech-flops/</link>
	<description>* A nibble is half a computing byte. A Tech PR Nibble is an insight or idea that can lead to conversation, a big idea or influence for a brand. The shared thinking of the global Ogilvy PR technology practice community; dedicated to Technology and Beyond. Participants in our social media world.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Azwar</title>
		<link>http://www.techprnibbles.com/2009/07/a-decade-of-tech-flops/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Azwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techprnibbles.com/?p=534#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Moral of the story? You win some, you lose some. 

What is interesting to me is - how many Sony products are in that list.

They push innovation and product ideas, but did they test the market, or having a good research to back up the development of a product? 

I'm sure they did, but where did they go wrong? Is the research not in-depth enough? Are they going by "gut feel" or by the strength of their brand name - that they can CREATE a need?

Which comes to another question for us all - how do we help our clients position their product. A solution looking for a problem/ need, or it is a solution that addresses a problem/ need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moral of the story? You win some, you lose some. </p>
<p>What is interesting to me is - how many Sony products are in that list.</p>
<p>They push innovation and product ideas, but did they test the market, or having a good research to back up the development of a product? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they did, but where did they go wrong? Is the research not in-depth enough? Are they going by &#8220;gut feel&#8221; or by the strength of their brand name - that they can CREATE a need?</p>
<p>Which comes to another question for us all - how do we help our clients position their product. A solution looking for a problem/ need, or it is a solution that addresses a problem/ need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
