by Jonathan Nguyen
Category: Global, Paperless PR, Social Media, Tech PR, Trends
Some time ago on a blog not so far away there was a posting about the role that borders play in digital influence. The conclusion that I drew was that borders have an extremely limited role to play when undertaking online campaigns.
An outlet’s reach is only as far as it can sustain continuous profitable distribution. In terms of heritage media, it was as far as they could truck newspapers overnight, or as far as a radio or television signal could be broadcast.
The result of this is that the only people that would have access to an outlet is those within its distribution network. This generally meant, within the same city, state or country.
It follows then, that what their audiences wanted to see and hear was what was happening in their communities.
Which lead to the local, state, national and world approach to news that we see today.
Who can blame us? It just makes sense. We work in geographical teams handing off work to in-country teams because they have better knowledge of their publics.
I said knowledge of their publics not knowledge of their geos or regions. Although in the old world these two aligned, in the world of Internet, your publics could be anyone, anywhere, the only commonality is they may want to hear your message.
Widget Company XYZ sells computer widgets globally. It’s customer base is truly global. The company is well regarded and its music playing widgets are popular the world over.
Due to its popularity there are a legion of bloggers, and tweeple that talk about its products the world over.
When customers have questions, they go to the internet and search for a solution and try to look for other people who have the same problem. Do you think they’re only going to try to find bloggers in Australia?
Well it’s not rocket science and I’m no rocket scientist. I think the answer actually lies in creating content aligned, not geography aligned teams. The teams may be geographically dispersed to aid in cultural differences but these virtual teams can be anywhere in the world.
If you are running a campaign to assist a product launch or educate your publics, you should be looking at any and every influencer not just those that are in your geo. Your publics won’t be that limited.
But really, was adapting to a mobile workforce easy when we first started trying to 10 years ago? We start by counselling ourselves, talking to our teams and get the conversation going. We then talk to our clients and get them thinking about these issues. It won’t change overnight because people won’t change overnight, but we have to start talking now.
Crossing the Pond Working with the Media in the UK and USA
February 25th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
Good point Jonathan. From an implementation perspective, it also helps to ensure that the teams have autonomy to arrange their marketing programs so that publics around the world can receive them in venues, media and other formats, that are most accessible and familiar to them. We tend to think of Google and Yahoo dominating the world; the fact is, publics in many regions are quite comfortable using other formats that most of us have never even seen. A few examples would be the Sonics social network which has many Spanish speaking folloewrs, or Bebo which is an eclectic mix of entertainment site and business communications vehicle, or, at the executive level there’s Monte Jade, which is a networking organization for Chinese investors in Silicon Valley and elsewhere.
February 25th, 2009 at 11:55 pm
My sentiments exactly. We have to unbind ourselves from these invented geographical constructs. The internet does not have geographies, why are we trying to overlay an old model? How do you bind twitter to geographies or blogs?